Mutton, Meters. Age., & Gilbride, K. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can incompatible relationships (pp. 33-60). Nyc: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lee, L., Loewenstein, Grams., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & More youthful, J. (2008). If I am not saying sensuous, could you be gorgeous or perhaps not?: Physical-appeal analysis and you may relationships needs while the a function of your very own elegance. Mental Technology, 19, 669677. [ Backlinks ]
Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in marriage or any other personal relationships. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Appropriate and in conflict dating (pp. 309-331). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Links ]
Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Amount of ambition. In J. McV. Have a look (Ed.), Identity and conclusion problems (Vol. step one, pp. 333378). New york: Ronald Press. [ Website links ]
Enjoying, T. J. (2006). Forecasting relationship matchmaking future with insiders’ and outsiders’ angle: Whom and you may what is questioned things escort services in Topeka. Private Dating, thirteen, 349-362. [ Website links ]
Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and relationship high quality into the newly weds: A couple oriented approach. Log away from Character and you can Personal Psychology, 88, 304-326. [ Backlinks ]
Legitimizing circumstances from the initiation out of heterosexual relationship
Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, A good. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, Age. Roentgen. (2006). Recognized similarity and relationship profits certainly one of dating couples: A keen idiographic strategy. Log off Social and personal Relationship, 23, 865-880. [ Backlinks ]
Madden, M., & Lenhart, An excellent. (2006). Matchmaking. Arizona, DC: Statement with the Pew Websites & Western Lives Investment. Recovered , out-of [ Backlinks ]
MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Meters. (1999). Examining the precision regarding forecasts in the relationships matchmaking: Exactly how and why manage lovers’ forecasts range from those people produced by perceiver? Identity and you can Societal Mindset Bulletin, twenty-five, 14171429. [ Backlinks ]
Brand new attraction-resemblance theory certainly get across-intercourse friends: Relationships satisfaction, sensed parallels, and you can mind-providing thinking
ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Papers displayed at Earliest All over the world Conference towards Individual Relationships, Madison, WI. [ Hyperlinks ]
Merkle, Age.Roentgen., & Richardson, Roentgen.A great. (2000). Digital relationship and virtual relevant: Conceptualizing computers mediated close relationship. Loved ones, forty-two, 187-192. [ Links ]
Montoya, R. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Was genuine similarity important for destination? An excellent meta-research away from genuine and you can sensed similarity. Log regarding Social and personal Relationships, twenty five, 889-922. [ Website links ]
Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationships pleasure as a predictor from resemblance analysis; An examination of your own interest-resemblance theory. Log off Public and private Matchmaking, 22, 561-584. [ Hyperlinks ]
Murstein, B. I. (1987). An explanation and you may expansion of one’s SVR theory out-of dyadic combining. Diary out of ily, 49, 929-947. [ Website links ]
Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who’ll splitting up: A 14-year longitudinal examination of black colored lovers and you can light lovers. Diary of Public and private Dating, 19, 179-202. [ Links ]
Orenstein, S. (). The latest like formula Suits believes it’s discovered an algorithm getting ruling the web dating organization: A technological approach to finding Mr. or Ms. Best. Providers dos.0 Magazine. Retrieved into the from [ Links ]
Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Only the congruent survive – Identification similarities inside the partners. Personality and you will Private Variations, 45, 533-535. [ Links ]
Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Spouse needs: Exactly what qualities would folks notice inside their brief-identity intimate and a lot of time-identity romantic lovers? Journal off Psychology and you may Peoples Sexuality, 12, 1-21. [ Links ]
Reis, H. T. (1985). The latest role of your own care about on the initiation and you will course of societal interaction. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and incompatible dating (pp. 209-231). Ny: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Links ]